step three. Show

Desk step 1 depicts the latest incidence of each of dangers of the research, with regards to the amount of severity discover. On top of that, it suggests the new comparisons between the withdrawals from girls and boys toward other threats. Total, the players just who exhibited no problem varied ranging from % who’d no problems having difficult Internet sites explore or over to help you 83.4% who had no troubles which have on line grooming. We remember that all of the moderate and you can big troubles varied between 4% to have sexting and you will 17% to have challenging Internet sites play with. 9% away from modest/big trouble and also in cyberbullying, they reached thirteen.7%. This new frequencies found in the additional degrees of trouble was basically always deeper for women compared to people.

Dining table step one

Frequency of any of your threats since the a function of this new seriousness of the condition on the overall take to as well as gender.

In this regard, significant differences were also found between boys and girls in the mean total scores of cyberbullying victimization (Welch’s t = ?2.02, p < 0.043, d = 0.07), online grooming (Welch's t = ?3.51, p < 0.001, d = 0.12) and problematic Internet use (Welch's t = ?2.07, p < 0.039, d = 0.07). In these cases, the mean scores were higher for girls than for boys. There were no significant differences in the rest of the risks: cyber dating abuse victimization (Welch's t = ?1.9, p < 0.058, d = 0.12) and sexting (Welch's t = 0.94, p < 0.410, d = 0.03).

Regarding the type of school (private and public), significant differences were only found in the risks of online grooming (t = ?3.37, p < 0.001, d = 0.13) and sexting (t = 3.8, p < 0.001, d = 0.15). The mean scores were higher in public schools than in private schools in both cases.

In terms of the educational stage (1st–2nd grade of CSE, 3rd–4th grade of CSE and Post-secondary Education), statistically significant differences were found for the risks of cyberbullying victimization (p < 0.002), online grooming (p < 0.001), sexting (p < 0.001) and problematic Internet use (p < 0.001). The scores were higher in 3rd–4th grades, except for online grooming victimization, where higher scores were found in Post-secondary Education (see Table dos ).

Table 2

Variations since the a purpose of informative stage (1st–2nd, 3rd–4th grades off CSE and you can Post-second Training) about dangers (n = 3212, apart from the fact from cyber relationship discipline with letter = 1061).

Note: Meters = arithmetic suggest; SD = practical departure, F = Welch’s-F, p = significance; ? dos = eta squared.

Table 3 suggests this new correlations within certain threats. Them had self-confident and high correlations along, towards the relationships between cyberbullying victimization and you may cyber relationships victimization condition away. Websites threats having a sexual part (on the internet brushing and sexting) have been highly correlated. Generally speaking, the fresh correlations were highest getting men in the most common of your own risks, apart from this new matchmaking anywhere between cyber relationship victimization and brushing and ranging from challenging Internet sites explore and you may cyberbullying victimization, on line brushing and sexting.

Dining table 3

Note: The correlations for boys are shown below the diagonal and for girls above it. All correlations are significant at p < 0.001. M = arithmetic mean; SD = standard deviation.

Desk cuatro gifts the new comorbidities among some Internet risks relevant in order to private correspondence (cyberbullying victimization, cyber relationship punishment victimization, sexting an internet-based brushing). Just the members whom complete every item concerning the threats relevant so you can victimization (n = 1109) was basically experienced (we.elizabeth., eliminating on the research those who didn’t come with companion). Of your own kept members, sixty.7% displayed at least one of your analysed daddyhunt hesap silme dangers (letter = 674). The danger for the higher private incidence try cyberbullying victimization (%), followed by on the internet brushing. The most widespread two-risk combinations had been cyberbullying victimization-on line grooming and cyberbullying-sexting. I highlight the three-exposure combination of cyberbullying-sexting-grooming victimization. Finally, 5.49% of the victimized teens demonstrated every risks conjointly.